Community Power, Not Towers!
Scenic Beauty of Colorado’s San Luis
Valley threatened.
Public comments due Thursday January 26th - Hearing Feb 2
![]() |
| Solar Reserve Project - Crescent Dunes, California |
When an independent review of the sound impacts of Tessera
Solar’s 2009 proposal was made, the results were dramatically different from
the company’s comforting claims.
Public comments are due by 3PM – Thursday January 26, 2012 – email to wmaez@saguachecounty.net
A public hearing will be held 2-8 PM - Thursday Feb. 2, 2012
at Center School Auditorium – 550 Sylvester Ave, Center CO 81125 – please RSVP to info@saveslv.org if you are coming.
Tell the Saguache County Commissioners:
Follow the BLM’s lead
and allow no power towers in the San Luis Valley.
Make any final
approval contingent on an independent study on visual impacts.
Make any final
approval contingent on observation of an operational Crescent Dunes project to
validate Solar Reserve’s claims.
The Solar Reserve project would
raise power prices throughout Colorado through a loophole that exempts
“experimental” projects from the 2% rate cap.
This would mean the price tag of over $1 billion would be tacked on to
everyone’s electric bills! Solar Reserve
tells me their technology is “proven” – they really shouldn’t be able to have
it both ways. Concentrated Solar Power
(CSP) projects are far more expensive than ordinary solar PV. Many CSP projects recently proposed for the
Mojave have been converted to PV or abandoned.
Solar Reserve’s project has been constructed with a $773 million DOE
loan guarantee from the same program as Solyndra’s.
The towers
would be located in the center of the San Luis Valley west of Great Sand Dunes
National Park, and would impact the Sangre de Cristo Wilderness, and the Sangre
de Cristo National Heritage Area. The
towers would be almost as high as the dunes themselves. Such a project would be more than just an
eyesore, a desecration of monumental proportions – it appalls me that it is
even being considered in such a scenic area.
Solar Reserve cannot mitigate the visual impact and thus the project
should be moved outside the valley where transmission is available, perhaps at
the site in Pueblo County where a nuclear plant was rejected.
In August
2011 the Journal of Solar Energy Engineering published a paper titled
“Methodology to Assess Potential Glint and Glare Hazards From Concentrating
Solar Power Plants: Analytical Models
and Experimental Validation.” The paper
models a solar tower half the size of Solar Reserve, and concludes “this
irradiance will not cause irreversible eye damage, but it is sufficient to
produce a temporary after image if one looks directly at the source”. The safe distance for the smaller was calculated to be 1840 meters – larger than
the radius of Solar Reserve’s proposed mirror field. Scaling up to Solar Reserve’s size would give
a “safe” distance of about two miles, and a mirage that magnified the size of
the bright spot tenfold would increase that to over 6 miles.
Even if the brightness of the towers
was not sufficient to cause temporary spot blindness, it would still be
distracting enough to mar the valley’s vistas throughout the entire valley
every moment that the sun shines for at least the next 50 years.
Morro Bay, California is the site
of a spectacular 576-foot volcanic plug.
In the 1950s Dynergy built a gas-fired power plant with 450-foot
stacks. Anyone who visits the town can’t
help but notice. Now, over 50 years
since the stacks were built, a lengthy process is underway to figure out how to
dismantle them. Did the power plant lead
to economic growth? In 2000, per capita
income in Morro Bay was $21,687. In Pismo Beach just to the south income was 42%
higher, and in Cambria, the neighboring town to the north, it was 36%
higher. It’s hard to say if the eyesore
stunted Morro Bay’s tourist economy, though – power plants are typically built
in lower income areas.
The project would kill birds
through mirror collisions - no mitigation could prevent this. (Don’t believe those guys that say the light
cone would fry the cranes and eagles of the valley. The birds would actually be vaporized.) There would be a risk of fire and explosions,
though not of nuclear scale.
Smart grid, battery storage, and
demand response can better provide resilient and reliable power to the San Luis
Valley for much less money. Solar
Reserve cannot store energy produced from other sources, and would saturate the
grid, making a distributed energy network impossible.
Again:
Public comments are due by 3PM – Thursday January 26, 2012 – email to wmaez@saguachecounty.net
A public hearing will be held 2-8 PM - Thursday Feb. 2 ,2012
at Center School Auditorium – 550 Sylvester Ave, Center CO 81125
Tell the Saguache County Commissioners:
Follow the BLM’s lead
and allow no power towers in the San Luis Valley.
Make any final
approval contingent on an independent study on visual impacts.
Make any final
approval contingent on observation of an operational Crescent Dunes project to
validate Solar Reserve’s claims.





0 comments:
Post a Comment